The Ultimate Guide to Verifying Trading Performance Claims 2025
🚨 The $4.7 Billion Problem Nobody Talks About
Every day, thousands of traders hand over their money to signal providers, Expert Advisor sellers, prop firm challenges, copy trading services, and managed account operators.
The pitch is always the same: "Look at these results! Join now and make the same profits!"
Then they show you a screenshot. A Myfxbook link. A Telegram channel full of winning trades. Instagram stories of luxury cars and beach vacations.
And here's the problem: 95% of it is either manipulated, cherry-picked, or outright fabricated.
I'm not exaggerating. A 2024 study by the Financial Conduct Authority found that over 90% of retail forex signal providers showed performance claims that couldn't be independently verified. Translation? They're probably lying.
But here's what gives me hope: the liars are lazy. They use the same tricks over and over. Once you know what to look for, spotting fake performance becomes ridiculously easy.
In this guide, I'm going to teach you the exact forensic techniques to verify trading performance claims. Whether someone is selling signals, EAs, managed accounts, or prop firm training—you'll know how to separate truth from fiction.
By the end of this article, you'll have a complete verification playbook that could save you thousands (or tens of thousands) of dollars.
Let's begin.
🎭 The Signal Provider Landscape: Who's Actually Selling What?
Before we dive into verification techniques, let's map out who's selling trading signals and what they're actually offering.
📱 Telegram/Discord Signal Providers
What they sell: Real-time trade alerts sent via messaging apps.
The pitch: "Join our VIP group! 90% win rate! $500/month!"
Common tricks:
- Multiple private groups (show winners to Group A, losers to Group B, then advertise Group A)
- Demo accounts presented as live
- Instant deletion of losing signals
- "Market conditions changed" excuses after losses
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ (5/5 - highest fraud risk)
🤖 Expert Advisor (EA) Sellers
What they sell: Automated trading robots for MetaTrader 4/5.
The pitch: "This EA made $50K in backtests! Set it and forget it!"
Common tricks:
- Backtests on cherry-picked historical data
- Curve-fitted to past data (won't work in future)
- Martingale or grid strategies (explode eventually)
- "Optimized" results that include all future data (impossible to replicate)
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ (4/5 - very high fraud risk)
💼 Managed Account Services (MAM/PAMM)
What they sell: They trade your money for you, take a percentage of profits.
The pitch: "Professional money managers! Verified track record! 40% annual returns!"
Common tricks:
- Showing only their best-performing accounts
- High water mark manipulation
- Switching strategies after showing results
- "Inheritance" fraud (buying old accounts with good history)
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (3/5 - moderate fraud risk, but higher stakes)
📊 Copy Trading Platforms (eToro, ZuluTrade, etc.)
What they sell: Automated copying of successful traders' positions.
The pitch: "Copy our top traders! Verified by the platform!"
Common tricks:
- Past performance doesn't guarantee future results
- Traders take excessive risks knowing followers absorb losses
- Platform fees eat into actual returns
- Slippage differences (you don't get same entry/exit)
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️ (2/5 - platforms provide some verification, but risks remain)
🏦 Prop Firm Challenge Sellers
What they sell: Training to pass prop firm evaluations.
The pitch: "I passed 10 challenges using this strategy! Get funded now!"
Common tricks:
- Passing challenges is different from sustained profitability
- Showing funded accounts but hiding failed payouts
- Short-term unsustainable strategies (news trading, latency arbitrage)
- Not disclosing violation/failure rates
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (3/5 - often real but misleading)
📈 Trading Course Creators
What they sell: Educational content, often bundled with signals.
The pitch: "I'll teach you my $1M strategy! Limited spots available!"
Common tricks:
- Their real income is from courses, not trading
- Results from years ago, now outdated
- Survivorship bias (only successful students testimonials shown)
- Fake scarcity ("only 5 spots left!" - fake countdown timers)
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (3/5 - education can be valuable, but verify trading claims)
🌐 Forex Fund Managers
What they sell: Investment pools promising fixed returns.
The pitch: "Guaranteed 8% monthly returns! Your principal is safe!"
Common tricks:
- Ponzi schemes (paying old investors with new investor money)
- Offshore entities with no regulation
- "Trade secrets" that prevent transparency
- Impossibly consistent returns (real trading has variance)
Red flag ratio: ⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️ (5/5 - often outright scams)
Now that you know the players, let's learn how to verify their claims.
🔍 The 7-Step Forensic Verification Framework
This is your step-by-step process to verify any trading performance claim. Follow these steps in order—each builds on the last.
Step 1: Demand Third-Party Verification
What it means: Results hosted on a platform the trader doesn't control.
Why it matters: If they control the data, they can manipulate it.
How to check:
- ✅ GOOD: Myfxbook, FX Blue, ShowMyTrades, prop firm verification pages
- ⚠️ SUSPICIOUS: Personal website screenshots, Excel files, Telegram screenshots
- ❌ REJECT: "I can't share publicly for privacy reasons" (but they'll share after you pay)
What to ask: "Can you provide a verified third-party link I can check independently?"
If they say no, walk away. Period.
💡 Pro Tip: Even third-party verification can be gamed (we'll cover how below). This is just step one.
Step 2: Check for Track Record Length
What it means: How long has this performance been sustained?
Why it matters: Anyone can get lucky for a month. Consistency over 12+ months is hard to fake.
How to check:
- Look at the account creation date (not when they started sharing it publicly)
- Verify continuous trading history (gaps suggest account switching)
- Compare recent performance to older performance (deterioration is common)
Red flags:
- 🚩 Less than 6 months of history
- 🚩 Account created recently but shows "years" of experience
- 🚩 Long periods of inactivity followed by "amazing" recent results
- 🚩 Different account IDs in different screenshots (account switching)
Minimum acceptable: 12 months of continuous, verified trading history.
Step 3: Verify It's a LIVE Account (Not Demo)
What it means: Confirming real money is at risk, not play money.
Why it matters: Demo trading eliminates psychological pressure, slippage, and real market conditions.
How to check:
For Myfxbook:
- Look for the "Real" badge (green checkmark)
- Check if "Verified" is shown (connects directly to broker)
- Click on "Trading Privileges" - should show "Investor Password" verification
For other platforms:
- Look for broker API connection (not manual uploads)
- Check for real-time tick data synchronization
- Verify account number matches broker statement
The demo account trick: Demo accounts often allow:
- Unrealistic leverage (1:1000+)
- No slippage simulation
- Perfect fills at limit prices
- No swap/commission costs
- Infinite resets (blow account, create new one)
Red flags:
- 🚩 Leverage over 1:500 (most live brokers cap at 1:100-1:200)
- 🚩 Zero swap charges on positions held overnight
- 🚩 Perfect execution on all orders
- 🚩 Refuses to show broker statement
What to ask: "Can you provide a broker statement with your account number visible? I'll verify it matches your tracking."
Step 4: Analyze the Equity Curve for Manipulation Patterns
What it means: Looking at the shape of the growth chart for telltale signs of dangerous strategies.
Why it matters: Certain strategies produce short-term gains but inevitable long-term explosions.
What to look for:
🎰 The Martingale Signature
- Smooth, consistent growth with sudden catastrophic drops
- Many small wins followed by one massive loss
- Drawdowns that are 50%+ of gains
- Recovery attempts that look like "doubling down"
Example pattern: +2%, +2%, +3%, +2%, -25%, +2%, +2%, +3%, -30%
Why it's dangerous: Works until it doesn't. One bad streak wipes out months of gains.
🕸️ The Grid Strategy Signature
- Extremely smooth equity curve (suspiciously smooth)
- Hundreds or thousands of open trades simultaneously
- Small profits on each trade
- Sudden massive losses when market trends strongly
Example pattern: Perfectly linear growth for months, then vertical drop
Why it's dangerous: Locks up massive margin in floating losses, eventually hits margin call.
⚡ The Latency Arbitrage Signature
- Extremely high win rate (95%+ winners)
- Very small profit per trade ($1-5)
- Hundreds of trades per day
- Trades held for seconds or minutes
Example pattern: 500 trades, 485 winners, $2 average profit, 15 losers
Why it's dangerous: Only works with specific broker setups, often against ToS, broker will ban you.
📰 The News Trading Signature
- Long periods of no trading
- Sudden clusters of trades around economic events
- High volatility trades with wide stop losses
- Inconsistent results (big wins and big losses)
Example pattern: Weeks of inactivity, then 20 trades during NFP/FOMC
Why it's problematic: Extreme slippage during news, hard to replicate, high risk.
📉 The Healthy Trading Signature (what you WANT to see)
- Gradual upward slope with normal drawdowns
- Consistent trading frequency
- Mix of wins and losses (not 90%+ win rate)
- Drawdowns that are proportional and recover gradually
- No catastrophic drops
Example pattern: Realistic variance that looks like actual trading, not a computer simulation
⚠️ Warning: If the equity curve looks "too perfect," it probably is. Real trading has bumps.
Step 5: Examine Risk Metrics, Not Just Returns
What it means: Understanding HOW profits were made, not just how much.
Why it matters: 100% returns with 90% drawdown is terrible. 20% returns with 5% drawdown is excellent.
Metrics to check:
Maximum Drawdown
- What it is: Biggest peak-to-trough decline
- Red flag: Over 30%
- Acceptable: Under 20%
- Excellent: Under 10%
Critical question: "What's your maximum drawdown, and how long did it take to recover?"
Sharpe Ratio
- What it is: Risk-adjusted returns
- Red flag: Below 0.5
- Acceptable: 1.0 - 2.0
- Excellent: Above 2.0
Critical question: "What's your Sharpe Ratio, and can you explain what it means?"
(If they don't know what Sharpe Ratio is, they're not professional traders.)
Profit Factor
- What it is: Gross profit ÷ gross loss
- Red flag: Below 1.3
- Acceptable: 1.5 - 2.0
- Excellent: Above 2.5
Average Trade Duration
- What it is: How long positions are held
- Red flag: Under 1 minute (likely arbitrage/scalping)
- Red flag: Wildly inconsistent (suggests strategy changes)
- Good: Consistent with claimed strategy
Risk Per Trade
- What it is: How much of the account is risked per position
- Red flag: Over 10% per trade
- Acceptable: 1-3% per trade
- Conservative: Under 1% per trade
What to ask: "What percentage of your account do you risk per trade, and can I see your position sizing over time?"
Step 6: Look for Hidden Costs and Selection Bias
What it means: Uncovering what they're NOT showing you.
Why it matters: Showing only the best results while hiding failures is the oldest trick in the book.
What to look for:
The Multiple Account Trick
Some sellers run 10 demo accounts with high-risk strategies. 8 blow up, 2 get lucky and perform well. They show you the 2 winners and hide the 8 losers.
How to spot it:
- Ask: "How many accounts have you traded with this strategy?"
- Ask: "Can you show me ALL accounts, including failures?"
- Check for account number sequences (Account #12345, #12347, #12349 - where's #12346 and #12348?)
The Time Period Cherry-Picking
Showing only their best month/quarter while hiding overall performance.
How to spot it:
- Ask for year-to-date AND all-time performance
- Check if they started tracking recently after a lucky streak
- Look for "since inception" dates that align with major market movements
The Survivorship Bias
Only showing testimonials/results from successful followers, ignoring the 90% who lost money.
How to spot it:
- Ask: "What percentage of your subscribers are profitable?"
- Ask: "What's the average subscriber return?" (not the best)
- Look for independent reviews on forums (ForexPeaceArmy, Reddit, Trustpilot)
The Missing Cost Disclosure
Not accounting for:
- Subscription fees
- Broker commissions
- Slippage
- Spread differences
- VPS costs (if required)
- Platform fees
How to spot it:
- Ask: "What are ALL costs to replicate these results, including subscriptions and trading costs?"
- Calculate net returns AFTER all fees
Step 7: Test Their Transparency and Communication
What it means: How they respond to difficult questions reveals their legitimacy.
Why it matters: Scammers dodge questions. Legitimate traders answer them.
Questions to ask:
About Losses:
- "What was your worst trading day/week/month?"
- "How do you handle losing streaks?"
- "What's your maximum consecutive losses?"
Good answer: Specific numbers, acknowledges difficulty, explains risk management.
Bad answer: Deflection, "that won't happen with my system," focus on positives only.
About Strategy:
- "What's your edge in the market?"
- "What happens if market conditions change?"
- "How does your strategy perform in ranging vs. trending markets?"
Good answer: Detailed explanation, acknowledges limitations, realistic about conditions.
Bad answer: Vague "secret sauce," claims it works in all conditions, refuses to explain.
About Verification:
- "Can you provide broker statements for the last 12 months?"
- "Can I speak with one of your long-term clients?"
- "Are you regulated, and if so, by whom?"
Good answer: Yes to all, provides documentation, transparent about regulation.
Bad answer: Privacy concerns, "trust me," only new clients available for reference.
🎯 The 12 Absolute Red Flags That Mean "RUN AWAY"
If you see ANY of these, don't walk—run:
🚩 1. Guaranteed Returns
"Guaranteed 10% monthly!" or "Risk-free profits!"
Reality: No legitimate trader guarantees returns. Ever. Markets are uncertain.
🚩 2. Unrealistic Win Rates
"98% winning trades!" or "We never lose!"
Reality: Professional hedge funds average 55-65% win rates. 95%+ suggests manipulation.
🚩 3. Pressure Tactics
"Only 3 spots left!" "Price doubles tomorrow!" "Limited time offer!"
Reality: Fake scarcity. If the results were real, they wouldn't need pressure tactics.
🚩 4. No Losing Trades Shown
Only winners in screenshots, no acknowledgment of losses.
Reality: Every trader has losses. Hiding them = hiding truth.
🚩 5. Lifestyle Marketing Over Results
More pictures of cars/watches/beaches than actual charts.
Reality: Real traders talk about trading. Scammers sell dreams.
🚩 6. Refusal to Provide Third-Party Verification
"I can't share for privacy" or "My broker doesn't allow it"
Reality: Every major broker supports investor password/read-only access.
🚩 7. Testimonials Only (No Verifiable Data)
Only "success stories" with no way to verify.
Reality: Testimonials can be bought on Fiverr for $5. Data can't.
🚩 8. Constantly Changing Stories
Strategy details change, promises evolve, goalposts shift.
Reality: Legitimate strategies stay consistent. Scammers adapt their lies.
🚩 9. Upfront Payment for "Lifetime Access"
$5,000 one-time payment for "forever" signals/EA.
Reality: If it worked, they'd charge subscription (ongoing profit). One-time = cash grab and disappear.
🚩 10. No Real Name or Company Details
Anonymous Telegram accounts, no legal entity, no regulation.
Reality: Legitimate businesses operate in the open. Scammers hide.
🚩 11. Martingale/Grid Strategies Not Disclosed
Smooth equity curve but doesn't mention doubling position sizes.
Reality: These strategies are ticking time bombs. Hiding the methodology = hiding the risk.
🚩 12. "Secret Strategy" That Can't Be Explained
"I can't share how it works, but trust me!"
Reality: Real edges can be explained without giving away exact parameters. Secrecy = they don't have an edge.
💀 Nuclear Red Flag: Asking for your trading account password (not investor password, actual trading password). THIS IS A SCAM. Never, ever give your trading password to anyone.
🛡️ The Verification Checklist: Your Due Diligence Workflow
Here's your practical, step-by-step checklist to use BEFORE paying for any signal, EA, or service:
Initial Screening (5 minutes):
- Third-party verification link provided?
- Track record at least 12 months?
- Account verified as LIVE (not demo)?
- Real name and company information available?
- No obvious red flags from the list above?
If ANY answer is "no," stop here. Don't proceed.
Deep Verification (30 minutes):
- Analyzed equity curve for Martingale/Grid patterns?
- Checked maximum drawdown (under 30%)?
- Verified Sharpe Ratio (above 1.0)?
- Profit Factor acceptable (above 1.5)?
- Risk per trade reasonable (under 5%)?
- No signs of multiple account manipulation?
- Strategy explained and makes logical sense?
- Losses acknowledged and explained?
If more than 2 answers are "no," reconsider.
Advanced Due Diligence (1-2 hours):
- Requested and received broker statements?
- Verified account numbers match across platforms?
- Checked independent reviews (ForexPeaceArmy, Reddit, Trustpilot)?
- Spoke with existing long-term clients?
- Calculated REAL returns after ALL fees?
- Asked difficult questions and received satisfactory answers?
- Checked regulatory status (if applicable)?
- Verified they actually trade (not just sell services)?
If more than 3 answers are "no," walk away.
Final Decision (Before Payment):
- Do the returns justify the risk?
- Can I afford to lose this money if it's a scam?
- Have I slept on this decision at least one night?
- Am I making this decision rationally (not emotionally)?
- Do I have a plan to monitor ongoing performance?
If ANY answer is "no," don't proceed.
🧪 Real-World Case Studies: Spotting Scams in Action
Let's apply this framework to real scenarios (names changed to protect identities):
Case Study 1: "The Telegram Millionaire"
The Pitch:
- 95% win rate on Telegram signals
- $500/month subscription
- "Certified" professional trader
- Luxury lifestyle on Instagram
The Investigation:
- ✅ Requested third-party verification → Provided Myfxbook link
- ❌ Account was only 3 months old
- ❌ Account verified as DEMO, not live
- ❌ Equity curve showed classic Martingale pattern
- ❌ Maximum drawdown was 65%
- ❌ When asked about drawdown, blocked me
Verdict: SCAM. Demo account + Martingale + short history = guaranteed disaster.
Outcome: Account blew up 6 weeks later. Telegram channel deleted. Reappeared 3 months later with new name.
Case Study 2: "The EA Miracle"
The Pitch:
- $2,000 for Expert Advisor
- Backtest results showing 400% annual returns
- "Works on any broker, any account size"
- Money-back guarantee (with fine print)
The Investigation:
- ✅ Backtest results provided
- ❌ Backtest used "all ticks" modeling (most accurate) but results were impossible
- ❌ Forward testing showed only 2 weeks of live results
- ❌ Strategy was grid-based (not disclosed)
- ❌ Optimization showed 100% curve-fitting to historical data
- ❌ "Money-back guarantee" required 6 months of specific conditions (impossible to meet)
Verdict: SCAM. Backtests optimized on historical data won't work in real-time.
Outcome: Bought it anyway (for research). Blew demo account in 3 weeks. Requested refund, denied due to "not following instructions." Lost $2,000.
Case Study 3: "The Prop Firm Coach"
The Pitch:
- $1,500 course to pass prop firm challenges
- "I passed 15 challenges!"
- Screenshots of funded accounts
- "90% of my students get funded"
The Investigation:
- ✅ Screenshots appeared genuine
- ✅ Could verify some prop firm accounts
- ⚠️ Strategy was pure news trading (high risk)
- ⚠️ Couldn't verify long-term payout success
- ⚠️ Students who got funded later failed due to rule violations
- ⚠️ Passing challenge ≠ sustained profitability
Verdict: MISLEADING, not pure scam. Strategy works short-term but unsustainable.
Outcome: Some students did pass challenges, but most violated rules during payout phase. Long-term success rate under 10%.
Case Study 4: "The Copy Trading Star"
The Pitch:
- Top trader on major copy trading platform
- Platform-verified results
- 200% returns in 12 months
- 500+ copiers
The Investigation:
- ✅ Platform verification legitimate
- ✅ 12+ months of history
- ✅ Live account confirmed
- ⚠️ Maximum drawdown was 45%
- ⚠️ Recent performance declining
- ⚠️ Strategy had changed midway (visible in trade history)
- ⚠️ Copiers experienced worse results due to slippage
Verdict: REAL but RISKY. Past performance + high drawdown + declining results = caution.
Outcome: Decided not to copy. Good decision—account hit 60% drawdown 4 months later, lost most copiers.
🌟 What LEGITIMATE Performance Verification Looks Like
So we've covered scams—but what about the real deal? Here's what trustworthy verification looks like:
✅ Characteristics of Legitimate Verification:
1. Transparent Third-Party Hosting
- Results on platforms they don't control
- Real-time synchronization via broker API
- Account number visible and verifiable
- Cannot be edited or manipulated by trader
Example platforms:
- Myfxbook (with broker verification)
- FX Blue (with live tracking)
- ShowMyTrades (with MT4/MT5 API sync)
- Prop firm official leaderboards
2. Complete History Disclosure
- All trades shown (winners AND losers)
- Continuous history with no gaps
- Drawdown periods clearly visible
- No deleted or hidden trades
3. Risk Metrics Front and Center
- Maximum drawdown prominently displayed
- Sharpe ratio calculated and shown
- Profit factor disclosed
- Risk per trade visible
4. Live Account Verification
- Broker API connection confirmed
- Real-time tick data synchronization
- Account type clearly stated (Live, not Demo)
- Broker name disclosed
5. Long Track Record
- Minimum 12 months of continuous trading
- Consistent strategy throughout
- Performance in different market conditions
- Recent results similar to historical results
6. Realistic Performance Claims
- Annual returns between 20-100% (not 500%)
- Win rates between 50-70% (not 95%)
- Drawdowns acknowledged (not hidden)
- Variance in monthly returns (not perfectly consistent)
7. Professional Communication
- Responds to questions about losses
- Explains strategy without "secrets"
- Provides broker statements upon request
- Acknowledges limitations and risks
✨ Gold Standard: When you find a trader who shows ALL of this, you've likely found someone legitimate. They're rare, but they exist.
🚀 How ShowMyTrades Solves the Verification Problem
Here's why we built ShowMyTrades—and how it addresses every issue we've discussed:
The Problem We Saw:
Traders had no easy way to share verified, tamper-proof performance. Screenshots could be faked. Excel files could be edited. Even some third-party platforms allowed manipulation.
Our Solution:
1️⃣ Direct Broker API Connection
- Connects directly to MT4/MT5 via secure API
- Pulls trade data in real-time, not manual uploads
- Trader cannot edit or delete trades
- Account verification happens automatically
2️⃣ Live vs. Demo Clearly Labeled
- Real accounts badged and verified
- Demo accounts marked prominently
- No way to pass off demo as live
3️⃣ Complete Transparency
- Every trade shown (no hiding losses)
- All risk metrics calculated automatically
- Drawdown periods visible in equity curve
- No way to cherry-pick results
4️⃣ Independent Third Party
- We have no financial incentive to inflate results
- Traders can't pay us to show better stats
- We're not their broker, not their affiliate
- Pure verification, no conflicts of interest
5️⃣ Free for Traders, Free for Verifiers
- Traders can share their verified results for free
- Anyone can check the results without paying
- No paywalls hiding the truth
- Transparency is the business model
Real-World Use Cases:
For Signal Providers: "Here's my ShowMyTrades profile—verify my results yourself before subscribing."
For Prop Traders: "Check my verified track record before you copy my trades."
For Seeking Investors: "Independent third-party verification of my 3-year performance."
For EA Sellers: "Here's the ShowMyTrades link for my EA running live—you decide if it works."
🎯 The Point: Verification should be free, transparent, and tamper-proof. That's what we built.
🎓 Final Thoughts: Trust, But Verify
Here's what I want you to remember from this guide:
1. Skepticism is Your Superpower If someone is offended that you want to verify their claims, that tells you everything you need to know.
2. Real Traders Welcome Scrutiny Legitimate professionals are proud to show their track records—warts and all. They know verification builds trust.
3. Your Money, Your Responsibility No one cares about your money more than you do. Do the work. Ask the questions. Demand proof.
4. Red Flags Are Patterns, Not Coincidences One red flag might be explainable. Three red flags is a pattern. Five red flags is a scam.
5. When in Doubt, Wait FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) causes more financial damage than any other emotion in trading. If you're unsure, wait. Real opportunities don't disappear in 24 hours.
6. Free Verification Exists—Use It You don't need to pay to verify someone's claims. Use platforms like ShowMyTrades to check independently before you commit.
✅ Your Action Plan
Here's what to do right now:
If you're currently subscribed to signals/services:
- Run through the verification checklist for your current provider
- Request third-party verification if you don't have it
- Calculate your actual returns after all fees
- Make a data-driven decision to continue or stop
If you're considering a new service:
- Bookmark this guide for reference
- Use the 7-step verification framework
- Complete the full due diligence checklist
- Sleep on the decision before paying
If you're a trader wanting to build credibility:
- Connect your accounts to verified platforms
- Share your complete track record (including drawdowns)
- Be transparent about your strategy and risks
- Let your results speak for themselves
Protect yourself. Verify everything. Trust data, not promises.
→ Verify trading performance on ShowMyTrades → See example verified profiles → Read our verification guides
Free verification. Complete transparency. No manipulation possible.
Questions about verifying a specific service? Need help analyzing track records? Reach out to our team at support@showmytrades.com—we're happy to help you avoid scams.